Agreement and consent in Kant and Habermas: Can Kantian constructivism be fruitful for democratic theory?1

Philosophical Forum 43 (3):277-295 (2012)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2012.00425.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kantian Value Realism.Alison Hills - 2008 - Ratio 21 (2):182–200.
Aristotelian Constructivism.Mark LeBar - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):182-213.
Negative Autonomy and the Intuitions of Democracy.Bryce Weber - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):325-346.
Two Concepts of Agreement.Christian List - 2002 - The Good Society 11 (1):72-79.
Hypothetical Consent in Kantian Constructivism.Thomas E. Hill - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):300.
Kantian Constructivism and Rawlsian Egalitarianism.Alan Roy Mattlage - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
How Kantian is Constructivism?Larry Krasnoff - 1999 - Kant-Studien 90 (4):385-409.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-18

Total downloads

21 ( #236,933 of 2,169,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,573 of 2,169,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums