Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation

Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation. Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks.Mark Parascandola - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):621-624.
Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Joseph Mahon - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):130-131.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Util‐izing Animals.Niall Shanks Hugh Lafollette - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Accept No Substitutes: The Ethics of Alternatives.Joel Marks - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):S16-S18.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
16 (#847,064)

6 months
10 (#207,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh LaFollette
University of South Florida

Citations of this work

Model Organisms are Not (Theoretical) Models.Arnon Levy & Adrian Currie - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):327-348.
Against external validity.Julian Reiss - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3103-3121.
Are animal models predictive for humans?Niall Shanks, Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:2.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references