Daedalus:85-105 (2017)

Authors
Cristina Lafont
Northwestern University
Abstract
This essay focuses on recent proposals to confer decisional status upon deliberative minipublics such as citizen juries, Deliberative Polls, citizen’s assemblies, and so forth. Against such proposals, I argue that inserting deliberative minipublics into political decision-making processes would diminish the democratic legitimacy of the political system as a whole. This negative conclusion invites a question: which political uses of minipublics would yield genuinely democratic improvements? Drawing from a participatory conception of deliberative democracy, I propose several uses of minipublics that could enhance the democratic legitimacy of political decision-making in current societies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Promise of Mediated Agreements.Richard Schmitt - 2019 - Journal of Social Philosophy 50 (2):232-250.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Political Egalitarian’s Dilemma.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373-387.
Robust Deliberative Democracy.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Critical Review 28 (3-4):494-516.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-14

Total views
267 ( #28,489 of 2,340,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #14,832 of 2,340,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes