Oxford: Oxford University Press (2020)

Authors
Cristina Lafont
Northwestern University
Abstract
This book articulates a participatory conception of deliberative democracy that takes the democratic ideal of self-government seriously. It aims to improve citizens' democratic control and vindicate the value of citizens' participation against conceptions that threaten to undermine it. The book critically analyzes deep pluralist, epistocratic, and lottocratic conceptions of democracy. Their defenders propose various institutional ''shortcuts'' to help solve problems of democratic governance such as overcoming disagreements, citizens' political ignorance, or poor-quality deliberation. However, all these shortcut proposals require citizens to blindly defer to actors over whose decisions they cannot exercise control. Implementing such proposals would therefore undermine democracy. Moreover, it seems naive to assume that a community can reach better outcomes 'faster' if it bypasses the beliefs and attitudes of its citizens. Unfortunately, there are no 'shortcuts' to make a community better than its members. The only road to better outcomes is the long, participatory road that is taken when citizens forge a collective will by changing one another's hearts and minds. However difficult the process of justifying political decisions to one another may be, skipping it cannot get us any closer to the democratic ideal. Starting from this conviction, the book defends a conception of democracy ''without shortcuts''. This conception sheds new light on long-standing debates about the proper scope of public reason, the role of religion in politics, and the democratic legitimacy of judicial review. It also proposes new ways to unleash the democratic potential of institutional innovations such as deliberative minipublics.
Keywords Democracy, Participation, Deliberation, Minipublics, Judicial Review
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9780198848189   0198848188
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can Truth (or Problem-Solving) Do More for Democracy?Justo Serrano Zamora - 2020 - Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 40 (1):82-90.
The Substance of Procedures.Sara Gebh - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):22-25.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Matters of Deliberative Democracy: Is Conversation the Soul of Democracy?Maria Corina Barbaros - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 7 (1):143-165.
Robust Deliberative Democracy.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Critical Review 28 (3-4):494-516.
Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Insincere Deliberation and Democratic Failure.Timur Kuran - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (4):529-544.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-16

Total views
14 ( #681,791 of 2,411,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,256 of 2,411,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes