Governments, grassroots, and the struggle for local food systems: containing, coopting, contesting and collaborating
Agriculture and Human Values 34 (3):663-681 (2017)
AbstractLocal sustainable food systems have captured the popular imagination as a progressive, if not radical, pillar of a sustainable food future. Yet these grassroots innovations are embedded in a dominant food regime that reflects productivist, industrial, and neoliberal policies and institutions. Understanding the relationship between these emerging grassroots efforts and the dominant food regime is of central importance in any transition to a more sustainable food system. In this study, we examine the encounters of direct farm marketers with food safety regulations and other government policies and the role of this interface in shaping the potential of local food in a wider transition to sustainable agri-food systems. This mixed methods research involved interview and survey data with farmers and ranchers in both the USA and Canada and an in-depth case study in the province of Manitoba. We identified four distinct types of interactions between government and farmers: containing, coopting, contesting, and collaborating. The inconsistent enforcement of food safety regulations is found to contain progressive efforts to change food systems. While government support programs for local food were helpful in some regards, they were often considered to be inadequate or inappropriate and thus served to coopt discourse and practice by primarily supporting initiatives that conform to more mainstream approaches. Farmers and other grassroots actors contested these food safety regulations and inadequate government support programs through both individual and collective action. Finally, farmers found ways to collaborate with governments to work towards mutually defined solutions. While containing and coopting reflect technologies of governmentality that reinforce the status quo, both collaborating and contesting reflect opportunities to affect or even transform the dominant regime by engaging in alternative economic activities as part of the ‘politics of possibility’. Developing a better understanding of the nature of these interactions will help grassroots movements to create effective strategies for achieving more sustainable and just food systems.
Similar books and articles
The Chisan-Chisho Movement: Japanese Local Food Movement and its Challenges. [REVIEW]Aya Hirata Kimura & Mima Nishiyama - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1):49-64.
The Restructuring of Food Systems: Trends, Research, and Policy Issues. [REVIEW]Mustafa Koc & Kenneth A. Dahlberg - 1999 - Agriculture and Human Values 16 (2):109-116.
Creating Space for Sustainable Food Systems: Lessons From the Field. [REVIEW]Gail Feenstra - 2002 - Agriculture and Human Values 19 (2):99-106.
The Local Industrial Complex? Questioning the Link Between Local Foods and Energy Use.Matthew J. Mariola - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (2):193-196.
Liberalism and the Two Directions of the Local Food Movement.Samantha Noll - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):211-224.
From Food Justice to a Tool of the Status Quo: Three Sub-Movements Within Local Food.Ian Werkheiser & Samantha Noll - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):201-210.
Mobility, Embodiment, and Scales: Filipino Immigrant Perspectives on Local Food. [REVIEW]J. M. Valiente-Neighbours - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (4):531-541.
Eating Right Here: Moving From Consumer to Food Citizen.Jennifer L. Wilkins - 2005 - Agriculture and Human Values 22 (3):269-273.
Are Local Food and the Local Food Movement Taking Us Where We Want to Go? Or Are We Hitching Our Wagons to the Wrong Stars?Laura B. DeLind - 2011 - Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2):273-283.
Place, Taste, or Face-to-Face? Understanding Producer–Consumer Networks in “Local” Food Systems in Washington State.Theresa Selfa & Joan Qazi - 2005 - Agriculture and Human Values 22 (4):451-464.
Local Autonomy and Sustainable Development: Testing Import Substitution in More Localized Food Systems. [REVIEW]Anne C. Bellows & Michael W. Hamm - 2001 - Agriculture and Human Values 18 (3):271-284.
Local Food and International Ethics.Mark C. Navin - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (3):349-368.
Consumer Perceptions About Local Food in New Zealand, and the Role of Life Cycle-Based Environmental Sustainability.S. Hiroki, E. Garnevska & S. McLaren - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (3):479-505.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Decoupling From International Food Safety Standards: How Small-Scale Indigenous Farmers Cope with Conflicting Institutions to Ensure Market Participation.Geovana Mercado, Carsten Nico Hjortsø & Benson Honig - 2018 - Agriculture and Human Values 35 (3):651-669.
The Power to Convene: Making Sense of the Power of Food Movement Organizations in Governance Processes in the Global North.Jill K. Clark, Kristen Lowitt, Charles Z. Levkoe & Peter Andrée - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (1):175-191.
Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping and Social Capital to Explain Differences in Sustainability Perceptions Between Farmers in the Northeast US and Denmark.Chris Kjeldsen, Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Bonnie Averbuch - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (1):435-453.
Effects of Institutional Pressures on the Governance of Food Safety in Emerging Food Supply Chains: A Case of Lebanese Food Processors.Gumataw Kifle Abebe - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (4):1125-1138.
Agencing an innovative territorial trade scheme between crop and livestock farming: the contributions of the sociology of market agencements to alternative agri-food network analysis.Ronan Le Velly & Marc Moraine - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (4):999-1012.
References found in this work
Mining for Justice in the Food System: Perceptions, Practices, and Possibilities. [REVIEW]Patricia Allen - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (2):157-161.
Framing Transformation: The Counter-Hegemonic Potential of Food Sovereignty in the US Context. [REVIEW]Madeleine Fairbairn - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):217-230.
A Food Politics of the Possible? Growing Sustainable Food Systems Through Networks of Knowledge.Alison Blay-Palmer, Roberta Sonnino & Julien Custot - 2016 - Agriculture and Human Values 33 (1):27-43.
Reconstructing the Good Farmer Identity: Shifts in Farmer Identities and Farm Management Practices to Improve Water Quality. [REVIEW]Jean McGuire, Lois Wright Morton & Alicia D. Cast - 2013 - Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1):57-69.
Safe at Any Scale? Food Scares, Food Regulation, and Scaled Alternatives.Laura B. DeLind & Philip H. Howard - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (3):301-317.