Procedural justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics

Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181 (2003)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453703029002143
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reply to Habermas.John Rawls - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):132-180.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dissent, Criticism, and Transformative Political Action in Deliberative Democracy.Christian Rostbøll - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):19-36.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate.J. Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
106 ( #49,029 of 2,197,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,376 of 2,197,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature