In S. Luper-Foy C. Brown (ed.), Drugs, Morality, and the Law. Garland (1994)

Authors
Hugh LaFollette
University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Abstract
By some estimates one-third of American corporations now require their employees to be tested for drug u se. The se requ iremen ts are com patible with general employment law while prom oting the public's in terest in figh ting drug use. Mo reover , the Unite d State s Supreme Court has ruled that drug tes ting prog rams a re cons titutionally p ermiss ible within both the public and the private sectors. It appears m andatory drug tes ting is a permanent fixture of American corporate life. (Bakaly, C. G., Grossman, J. M. 1989) The legal roots of m anda tory drug testing are found in the com mon la w doctrin e of "employment at will." That doctrine states that either party to an employment contract can termina te the contract for any reason, at any time, unless the contract specifies otherwise. As the Court h eld in Adair v. United States (208 U.S. 161, 175-6, 1908), the employer "was at liberty, in his d iscretion , to discha rge [the e mploy ee] from service w ithout givin g any reason for so do ing." In unqualified form, this doctrine would give employers effective control over employees. Employers could establish any requirements they wished for prospective and current employees. Not only could they decline to hire employees who will refuse drug tests, they could likewise decline to hire people with characteristics, beliefs, or behavior they dislike. Employees must endure these requirements or seek emplo yment elsewhere. However, since m ost peo ple hav e limited job opp ortunities , they will be forced to "a ccept" these require ments , no ma tter how objection able. Courts and legislatures have since recognized the abuses this 283 284 Drugs, Morality, and the Law..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Drug Testing and Productivity.Nicholas J. Caste - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):301 - 306.
生命的哲学 ‐后基因时代药物筛选策略与传统中药学理论.Xiao Ming Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:139-142.
America's Unjust Drug War.Michael Huemer - 2004 - In Bill Masters (ed.), The New Prohibition. Accurate Press.
The Universal Drug Testing of Employees.Douglas Birsch - 1995 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 14 (3):43-59.
Toward Drug Control: Exclusion and Buyer Licensing. [REVIEW]Jim Leitzel - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):99-119.
Mandatory Drug Testing Needs Controlled Evaluation.Thomas R. Kosten - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):32-32.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
101 ( #90,595 of 2,330,359 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #584,494 of 2,330,359 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes