On the emotional character of trust

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2):171-189 (2001)
Abstract
Trustful interaction serves the interests of those involved. Thus, one could reason that trust itself may be analyzed as part of rational, goaloriented action. In contrast, common sense tells us that trust is an emotion and is, therefore, independent of rational deliberation to some extent. I will argue that we are right in trusting our common sense. My argument is conceptual in nature, referring to the common distinction between trust and pure reliance. An emotional attitude may be understood as some general pattern in the way the world or some part of the world is perceived by an individual. Trust may be characterized by such a pattern. I shall focus on two central features of a trusting attitude. First, trust involves a participant attitude (Strawson) toward the person being trusted. Second, a situation of trust is perceived by a trusting person as one in which shared values or norms motivate both his own actions as well as those of the person being trusted. As an emotional attitude, trust is, to some extent, independent of objective information. It determines what a trusting person will believe and how various outcomes are evaluated. Hence, trust is quite different from rational belief and the problem with trust is not adequately met in minimizing risk by supplying extensive information or some mechanism of sanctioning. Trust is an attitude that enables us to cope with risk in a certain way. If we want to promote trustful interaction, we must form our institutions in ways that allow individuals to experience their interest and values as shared and, thus, to develop a trusting attitude.
Keywords cooperation  emotion  faith  rational choice  trust
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1011425102875
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,162
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Surrogate Motherhood: A Trust-Based Approach.Katharina Beier - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (6):633-652.
Catching the WAVE: The Weight-Adjusting Account of Values and Evidence.Boaz Miller - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:69-80.
Trust, Social Norms, and Motherhood.Amy Mullin - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):316–330.
Reasonable Trust.Evan Simpson - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):402-423.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Trusting Virtual Trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
A Genealogy of Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2007 - Episteme 4 (3):305-321.
Responding to Trust.Matthew Harding - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (1):75-87.
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe.Richard Holton - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):63 – 76.
On the Attitude of Trust.Lars Hertzberg - 1988 - Inquiry 31 (3):307 – 322.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

68 ( #74,899 of 2,152,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #226,015 of 2,152,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums