Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (8):933-947 (2012)
AbstractMany tertiary-level courses assess students’ participation in tutorial or online discussions. However, in educational and pedagogical research literature, criteria for assessing students’ skills in engaging with peers remain unclear. This article describes an online assignment with a set of participation criteria and a method for assessing the quality of students’ interactions with peers. The assignment focuses on students’ ability to utilise their critical thinking skills while engaging with peers on a particular topic. This includes abilities such as responding to criticism, justifying one’s view and contributing to discussion. While the assignment is designed for a critical thinking course in a philosophy curriculum, the method and participation criteria may be adapted for assessment in other discipline areas.
Similar books and articles
Critical Thinking and Asynchronous Discussion.John Miller - 1999 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 19 (1):18-27.
Course Participation: Defining and Evaluating Student Participation.Jessey Wright - 2015 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 1:219-232.
Grading (Anxious and Silent) Participation: Assessing Student Attendance and Engagement with Short Papers on a “Question For Consideration".Kathryn J. Norlock - 2016 - Teaching Philosophy 39 (4):483-505.
Assessing project approval procedures as formalised forms of public participation.Michael Zschiesche - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
“It is complicated!”: Practices and challenges of generic skills assessment in Vietnamese universities.Tran Le Huu Nghia - 2017 - Educational Studies 44 (2):230-246.
Reconceptualising political participation.Yerkebulan Sairambay - 2020 - Human Affairs 30 (1):120-127.
The Effects of an Online Seminars Policy on Communication between Faculty and Students in the Online Learning Environment.Peter Kiriakidis - 2011 - Postmodern Openings 2 (6):39-55.
Online Learning: A User-Friendly Approach for High School and College Students.Leslie Bowman & J. Michael Tighe Jr - 2010 - R&L Education.
What students want? Exploring the role of the institution in supporting successful learning journeys in online distance education.Dawn Mannay & Ceri Wilcock - 2015 - Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 17 (1): 49-63..
Misconceptions and realities about teaching online.Joan E. Sieber - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):329-340.
Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in Introduction to Philosophy.Maralee Harrell - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):31-39.
Heterogeneity within homogeneity: Impact of online skills on the use of online news media and interactive news features.Leen D’Haenens & Michael Opgenhaffen - 2012 - Communications 37 (3):297-316.
YUTPA as a design tool for public participation.Maurice Berix - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (1):165-172.
An Investigation of the Relationships Among Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Participation and Ethical Judgment and Decision Making.Anne L. Christensen & Angela Woodland - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 147 (3):529-543.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads