Frontiers of Philosophy in China 14 (1):132-151 (2019)

Authors
Karyn L. Lai
University of New South Wales
Abstract
Mengzi maintained that both benevolence (ren 仁) and rightness (yi 義) are naturally-given in human nature. This view has occupied a dominant place in Confucian intellectual history. In Mencius 6A, Mengzi's interlocutor, Gaozi, contests this view, arguing that rightness is determined by (doing what is fitting, in line with) external circumstances. I discuss here some passages from the excavated Guodian texts, which lend weight to Gaozi's view. The texts reveal nuanced considerations of relational proximity and its limits, setting up requirements for moral action in scenarios where relational ties do not play a motivational role. I set out yi's complexity in these discussions, highlighting its implications for (i) the nei-wai debate; (ii) the notion of yi as "rightness," or doing the right thing; and (iii) how we can understand the connection between virtue and right action in these early Confucian debates. This material from the excavated texts not only provides new perspectives on a longstanding investigation of human nature and morality, it also challenges prevailing views on Warring States Confucian intellectual history. In the well-known debate between Mengzi and Gaozi in Mencius 6A, Mengzi maintained that both ren and yi are naturally-given 1 in human nature. The figure 1 To say that ren and yi are naturally-given is not to say that they are fully-developed from the start. I use the phrase "naturally-given" throughout the paper to indicate where a particular capacity or resource (ren or yi) may be found, rather than its final polished state.
Keywords Guodian manuscripts  Confucian philosophy  Emotions  Morality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mencius and Early Chinese Thought.Kwong-loi Shun - 1997 - Stanford University Press.
Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations.Alan K. L. Chan (ed.) - 2017 - University of Hawaii Press.
4. Biology and Culture in the Mencian View of Human Nature.Irene Bloom - 2017 - In Alan K. L. Chan (ed.), Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 91-102.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mengzi’s Moral Psychology, Part 1: The Four Moral Sprouts.John Ramsey - 2018 - 1000-Word Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology.
The Problem of Moral Spontaneity in the Guodian Corpus.Edward Slingerland - 2008 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):237-256.
Mengzi, Strategic Language, and the Shaping of Behavior.Steven F. Geisz - 2008 - Philosophy East and West 58 (2):190-222.
Correlative Reasoning About Water in Mengzi 6A2.Nicholaos Jones - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):193-207.
The Debate on Human Nature in Early Confucian Literature.Maurizio Scarpari - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (3):323-339.
Emotion and Judgment: Two Sources of Moral Motivation in Mèngzǐ.Myeong-Seok Kim - 2018 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17 (1):51-80.
Mengzi’s Maxim for Righteousness in Mengzi 2A2.Dobin Choi - 2019 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18 (3):371-391.
The Important Discovery of Pre-Qin Confucian Texts.Li Xueqin - 2000 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 32 (1):58-62.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-04-17

Total views
22 ( #441,310 of 2,324,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,003 of 2,324,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes