Abstract

Kant, Fichte that his interpretation of Kant's transcendental philosophy to clarify the deeper meaning, this paper discusses: Kant's critical philosophy has not developed a system of transcendental philosophy, Fichte is the idea of trying to learn his knowledge transcendental philosophy and the development of their philosophical system, based on this attempt of the reasons why? Fichte's early knowledge of the basic principles in the 1794's "assessment"埃奈西德穆"" to already develop its first shape and the interpretation of Kant, Fichte, self-awareness primitive action as the basic principle, this comparison at the time of Kant and scholar Reinhard Hede , pointed out how Fichte gradually deepen his knowledge as a transcendental philosophy of this school starting point of thinking, and philosophy of Kant solved the main problem of division. This trail runs through to 1795 has been the first important works of Fichte's all: "knowledge science base." This article attempts to clarify the question of Fichte's interpretation of Kant and the starting point of transcendental philosophy as a system. Fichte criticized Kant's understanding of transcendental philosophy and explained the failure of Kant to develop a "system" of transcendental philosophy. Fichte developed the theory of "Tathandlung" and regarded it as the first principle of a system of transcendental philosophy. In this paper, we proceed from the point of view of a Kantian scholar KL Reinhold in analyzing Fichte's criticism of Kant and his attempt to find a "system" in Fichte's "Recension des Aenesidemus"