New Reproductive Technologies are Morally Problematic

In James Torr (ed.), Medical Ethics. Greenhaven Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A short article examining the problems of the fertility industry, commodifying human life and allowing unaccountable third parties to create children in ways that undermine their identity by way of donor conception, human cloning and artificial reproductive techniques.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Use or refuse reproductive genetic technologies: Which would a 'good parent' do?Janet Malek - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (2):59-64.
The texture of reproductive choice : law, ethnography, and reproductive technologies.Thérèse Murphy - 2009 - In New technologies and human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
The new reproductive technologies: Defying God's Dominion?Maura Anne Ryan - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):419-438.
Review: The Growing Feminist Debate over the New Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW]Anne Donchin - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):136-149.
Legal issues of maternity and inheritance for the biotech child of the 21st century.Kristine S. Knaplund - unknown
Legal Responses to some of the New Developments in Reproductive Technologies Part.3 The Future of Reproductive Technologies and the Law.Andrew Scott - 2002 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (2):24 - 28.
Socializing the public: invoking Hannah Arendt’s critique of modernity to evaluate reproductive technologies. [REVIEW]Daniel Sperling - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive / Infertility Technologies.Maren Klawiter - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):65 - 89.
Access to assisted reproductive technologies in France: the emergence of the patients' voice. [REVIEW]Véronique Fournier, Denis Berthiau, Julie D’Haussy & Philippe Bataille - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity.Mark Greene - 2009 - In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 307-317.
On being genetically "irresponsible".Judith Andre, Leonard M. Fleck & Thomas Tomlinson - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):129-146.
Knowledge, bodies, and values: Reproductive technologies and their scientific context.Helen E. Longino - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (3-4):323 – 340.
Moral arguments against the cloning of humans.C. F. Gethmann & F. Thiele - 2001 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):35-46.
Understanding risks and benefits in research on reproductive genetic technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Is it “every man's right to have babies if he wants them”?: Male pregnancy and the limits of reproductive liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 275-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-15

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline A. Laing
Oxford University (DPhil)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references