Health Care Analysis 17 (1):20-35 (2008)
Abstract |
In the Netherlands, current policy opinion emphasizes demand-driven health care. Central to this model is the view, advocated by some Dutch health policy makers, that patients should be encouraged to be aware of and make use of health quality and health outcomes information in making personal health care provider choices. The success of the new health care system in the Netherlands is premised on this being the case. After a literature review and description of the new Dutch health care system, the adequacy of this demand-driven health policy is tested. The data from a July 2005, self-administered questionnaire survey of 409 patients (response rate of 94%) as to how they choose a hospital are presented. Results indicate that most patients did not choose by actively employing available quality and outcome information. They were, rather, referred by their general practitioner. Hospital choice is highly related to the importance a patient attaches to his or her physician’s opinion about a hospital. Some patients indicated that their hospital choice was affected by the reputation of the hospital, by the distance they lived from the hospital, etc. but physician’s advice was, by far, the most important factor. Policy consequences are important; the assumptions underlying the demand-driven model of patient health provider choice are inadequate to explain the pattern of observed responses. An alternative, more adequate model is required, one that takes into account the patient’s confidence in physician referral and advice
|
Keywords | Demand-driven care Health policy Hospital choice Survey |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2009 |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10728-008-0093-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance After Reform.Hans Maarse & Ruud Ter Meulen - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (1):37-49.
A Fair Range of Choice: Justifying Maximum Patient Choice in the British National Health Service. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):59-72.
Fighting Sectional Interests in Health Care.Margo Trappenburg - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (3):223-237.
Citations of this work BETA
Multilevel Modeling and Policy Development: Guidelines and Applications to Medical Travel.Eduardo Garcia-Garzon, Peter Zhukovsky, Elisa Haller, Sara Plakolm, David Fink, Dafina Petrova, Vaishali Mahalingam, Igor G. Menezes & Kai Ruggeri - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
The Doctor and the Market: About the Influence of Market Reforms on the Professional Medical Ethics of Surgeons and General Practitioners in The Netherlands. [REVIEW]Jolanda Dwarswaard, Medard Hilhorst & Margo Trappenburg - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):388-402.
Switching Health Insurance Plans: Results From a Health Survey. [REVIEW]Christiaan J. Lako, Pauline Rosenau & Chris Daw - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):312-328.
Similar books and articles
Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance After Reform.Hans Maarse & Ruud Ter Meulen - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (1):37-49.
Gate-Keeping or Free Choice in Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Teams.Dieneke Hubbeling - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (3):111-115.
The Fallacy of Choice in the Common Law and NHS Policy.Ingrid Whiteman - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (2):146-170.
Demands for Religious Care in the Taiwanese Health System.Huey-Ming Tzeng & Chang-Yi Yin - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (2):163-179.
Switching Health Insurance Plans: Results From a Health Survey. [REVIEW]Christiaan J. Lako, Pauline Rosenau & Chris Daw - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):312-328.
Patients' Rights in Hospital: An Empirical Investigation in Finland.Helena Leino-Kilpi & Kristiina Kurittu - 1995 - Nursing Ethics 2 (2):103-113.
The Doctor and the Market: About the Influence of Market Reforms on the Professional Medical Ethics of Surgeons and General Practitioners in The Netherlands. [REVIEW]Jolanda Dwarswaard, Medard Hilhorst & Margo Trappenburg - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):388-402.
A Fair Range of Choice: Justifying Maximum Patient Choice in the British National Health Service. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):59-72.
Implicit and Explicit Clinical Ethics Support in The Netherlands: A Mixed Methods Overview Study. [REVIEW]Linda Dauwerse, Froukje Weidema, Tineke Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy Widdershoven - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (2):95-109.
Provider Choice: Essential To Autonomy or Advertising Gimmick?Douglas P. Olsen - 1996 - Nursing Ethics 3 (2):108-117.
Patient Participation in Hospital Care: How Equal is the Voice of the Client Council?Hanneke van der Meide, Gert Olthuis & Carlo Leget - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (3):238-252.
User‐Driven Health Care: Answering Multidimensional Information Needs in Individual Patients Utilizing Post–EBM Approaches: An Operational Model.Rakesh Biswas, Jayanthy Maniam, Edwin Wen Huo Lee, Premalatha Gopal, Shashikiran Umakanth, Sumit Dahiya & Sayeed Ahmed - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):750-760.
The Effects of Fraud on the Evaluation of Health Care.Paul Jesilow - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (3):239-245.
Beyond Health Outcomes: The Benefits of Health Care. [REVIEW]Gavin Mooney - 1998 - Health Care Analysis 6 (2):99-105.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-24
Total views
53 ( #216,169 of 2,520,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,893 )
2013-11-24
Total views
53 ( #216,169 of 2,520,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads