Cognitive Science 36 (3):517-544 (2012)
When people describe motion events, their path expressions are biased toward inclusion of goal paths (e.g., into the house) and omission of source paths (e.g., out of the house). In this paper, we explored whether this asymmetry has its origins in people’s non-linguistic representations of events. In three experiments, 4-year-old children and adults described or remembered manner of motion events that represented animate/intentional and physical events. The results suggest that the linguistic asymmetry between goals and sources is not fully rooted in non-linguistic event representations: linguistic descriptions showed the goal bias for both kinds of events, whereas non-linguistic memory for events showed the goal bias only for events involving animate, goal-directed motion. The findings are discussed in terms of the mapping between non-linguistic representations of goals and sources in language, focusing on the role that linguistic principles play in producing a more absolute goal bias from more gradient non-linguistic representations of paths
|Keywords||Prominence hierarchies Conceptual representations Syntax Motion events Goal Semantics Space‐language interface Source|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Infants Selectively Encode the Goal Object of an Actor's Reach.A. Woodward - 1998 - Cognition 69 (1):1-34.
“What” and “Where” in Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition.Barbara Landau & Ray Jackendoff - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):217.
Citations of this work BETA
The Amelia Bedelia Effect: World Knowledge and the Goal Bias in Language Acquisition.Mahesh Srinivasan & David Barner - 2013 - Cognition 128 (3):431-450.
Giving and Taking: Representational Building Blocks of Active Resource-Transfer Events in Human Infants.Denis Tatone, Alessandra Geraci & Gergely Csibra - 2015 - Cognition 137:47-62.
Similar books and articles
Source-Goal Asymmetries in Motion Representation: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension.Anna Papafragou - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (6):1064-1092.
When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.Anna Papafragou - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):75-87.
When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.Lila Gleitman - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):75-87.
Shake, Rattle, 'N' Roll: The Representation of Motion in Language and Cognition.Anna Papafragou - 2002 - Cognition 84 (2):189-219.
Does Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish Speakers.Panos Athanasopoulos & Emanuel Bylund - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (2):286-309.
Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Categorization of Complex Motion Events.Jeff Loucks & Eric Pederson - 2010 - In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event Representation in Language and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Perceiving and Remembering Events Cross-Linguistically: Evidence From Dual-Task Paradigms.John C. Trueswell & Anna Papafragou - unknown
Scaling Up From Atomic to Complex Events.Jeffrey M. Zacks - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):909-910.
Perceiving and Describing Motion Events.Shulan Lu & Donald R. Franceschetti - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):295-296.
Added to index2012-01-19
Total downloads386 ( #6,580 of 2,164,582 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,912 of 2,164,582 )
How can I increase my downloads?