British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922 (2000)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/51.4.919 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (4):464-482.
Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.Fabien Medvecky - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1393-1408.
Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-16.
Paul Feyerabend on the Scientific Worldview: Towards Questioning the Scientific Uniformity.N. I. Petrunok - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 6:113-124.
Similar books and articles
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.
For and Against Method, Including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method, and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. By Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]J. Preston - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (2):258-258.
Brecht and Lukács as Teachers of Feyerabend and Lakatos: The Feyerabend-Lakatos Debate as Scientific Recapitulation of the Brecht- Lukács Debate.Val Dusek - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):25-44.
Economic Method and Economic Rhetoric.John Maloney - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):253-268.
Imre Lakatos i Paul Fayerabend czyli za i przeciw metodzie [recenzja] Paul K. Feyerabend, Ammazzando il tempo. Un'autobiografia, 1994. Imre Lakatos, Paul K. Feyerabend, Sull'orlo della scienza. Pro e contro il metodo, 1995. [REVIEW]Tadeusz Sierotowicz - 1996 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 18.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method Reviewed By.Mary Leng - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (2):115-117.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method, Ed. By Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]H. Chang - 2000 - Annals of Science 57:456-457.
On the Critique of Scientific Reason.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1976 - In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 109--143.
Review. Matteo Motterlini (Ed). Imre Lakatos. Paul K Feyerabend. Sull'orlo Della Scienza: Pro E Contro Il Metodo. (On the Threshold of Science: For and Against Method). [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):476-478.
The Bid to Transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi Connection.Stefania Ruzsits Jha - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (3):318-346.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-03-20
Total views
11 ( #852,558 of 2,507,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,504 )
2014-03-20
Total views
11 ( #852,558 of 2,507,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
