Augustinian Studies 48 (1):119-159 (2017)

Authors
Michael Lamb
Princeton University
Abstract
One of the most controversial aspects of Augustine’s political thought is his use of imperial power to coerce religious dissenters. While scholars have sought to situate Augustine’s justifications of coercion within his historical, social, and political contexts, even the most helpful approaches do not alleviate concerns that Augustine’s defense of coercion violates individual liberty. This paper argues that one reason for this is that many defenders and detractors tend to view Augustine’s defense through a largely liberal lens, assuming a modern conception of liberty and legitimacy that is alien to his late antique context. In contrast, this paper highlights how Augustine appropriates republican principles from his Roman predecessors to justify coercion and place limits on its use. In particular, it focuses on Augustine’s commitments to: liberty as non-domination; legitimate authority and the rule of law as constraints on arbitrary power; and contestability, publicity, and immanent critique as means of preventing domination and holding power accountable. By showing how the content and form of Augustine’s reasoning align with republican principles, this paper suggests that his defense of coercion appears less inimical to liberty in his Roman context than his modern interpreters typically assume. The paper concludes by considering how this republican approach might help to preserve liberty and prevent domination in our own time.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Major Philosophers  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0094-5323
DOI 10.5840/augstudies201792636
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Invigilating Republican Liberty.Gerald Lang - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):273-293.
Non-Domination as a Moral Ideal.Christian Nadeau - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):120-134.
From Republican to Liberal Liberty.Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
From Republican to Liberal Liberty.. Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
Republican Liberty Considered.M. M. Goldsmith - 2000 - History of Political Thought 21 (3):543-560.
Liberty Exposed: Quentin Skinner's Hobbes and Republican Liberty.Patricia Springborg - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):139-162.
The Tension Between Law and Politics in the Modern Republican Tradition.Marco Geuna - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh University Press.
Four Conceptions of Freedom.Horacio Spector - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (6):780-808.
Democratical Gentlemen and the Lust for Mastery.Daniel Kapust - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (4):648-675.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-10

Total views
15 ( #658,040 of 59,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,645 of 59,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes