The Monist 80 (4):521-538 (1997)

Authors
John Lamont
Australian Catholic University
Abstract
The paper corrects misrepresentations of Aquinas's understanding of divine simplicity, argues that the reasons he gives for divine simplicity are persuasive ones, and suggests how Aquinas's account of the Trinity can be used to explain how God can be said to exist necessarily. It gives an account of Aquinas's conception of form and individualised form, and shows how Plantinga's criticism of Aquinas's position on divine simplicity rests on a misunderstanding of Aquinas's notion of form. It describes and makes the case for Aquinas's argument that God must be absolutely simply because he is the uncaused cause of all effects, and any real composition in things constitutes an effect. It shows that Brian Davies is mistaken in claiming that Aquinas does not hold God's existence to be logically necessary. It applies Frege's conception of existence to Aquinas's account of God's simplicity and his psychological analogy for the Trinity, in order to explain how God's existence can coherently be said to be logically necessary.
Keywords Aquinas  divine simplicity  forms  existence
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist199780424
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Divine Simplicity.William F. Vallicella - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.
Divine Properties, Parts, and Parity.Joseph Stenberg - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (5):388-405.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Aquinas Among Libertarians and Compatibilists: Breaking the Logic of Theological Determinism.W. Matthews Grant - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:221-235.
Thomas Aquinas and Divine Command Theory.M. Dougherty - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:153-164.
Simplicity and Aseity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2009 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. pp. 105-28.
On Whether Aquinas’s Ipsum Esse Is “Platonism”.Stephen L. Brock - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303.
The Deadlock of Absolute Divine Simplicity.Yann Schmitt - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
105 ( #103,844 of 2,454,557 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #73,455 of 2,454,557 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes