The Monist 80 (4):521-538 (1997)
AbstractThe paper corrects misrepresentations of Aquinas's understanding of divine simplicity, argues that the reasons he gives for divine simplicity are persuasive ones, and suggests how Aquinas's account of the Trinity can be used to explain how God can be said to exist necessarily. It gives an account of Aquinas's conception of form and individualised form, and shows how Plantinga's criticism of Aquinas's position on divine simplicity rests on a misunderstanding of Aquinas's notion of form. It describes and makes the case for Aquinas's argument that God must be absolutely simply because he is the uncaused cause of all effects, and any real composition in things constitutes an effect. It shows that Brian Davies is mistaken in claiming that Aquinas does not hold God's existence to be logically necessary. It applies Frege's conception of existence to Aquinas's account of God's simplicity and his psychological analogy for the Trinity, in order to explain how God's existence can coherently be said to be logically necessary.
Similar books and articles
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas' Philosophical Theology.Christopher Hughes - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
Aquinas, divine simplicity and divine freedom.Brian Leftow - 2009 - In Kevin Timpe & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. Routledge.
Aquinas among Libertarians and Compatibilists: Breaking the Logic of Theological Determinism.W. Matthews Grant - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:221-235.
Thomas Aquinas and Divine Command Theory.M. Dougherty - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:153-164.
Simplicity and aseity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2009 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. pp. 105-28.
Norman Kretzmann on Aquinass attribution of will and of freedom to create to God.John F. Wippel - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
On Whether Aquinas’s Ipsum Esse Is “Platonism”.Stephen L. Brock - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303.
Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today's Debate on Divine Action.Ignacio Silva - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (4):658-667.
The deadlock of absolute divine simplicity.Yann Schmitt - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Problem of Contraries and Prime Matter in the Reception of Aristotle’s Physical Corpus in the Work of Thomas Aquinas.Ana Maria C. Minecan - 2016 - Svmma Revista de Cultures Medievals 7:20-39.
References found in this work
No references found.