Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):121-124 (1996)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The paper considers René Descartes’ assertion that believing that God exists because the Bible says so, and believing that what the Bible says is true because God says it, involves circular reasoning. It argues that there is no circularity involved in holding these beliefs, and maintains that the appearance of circularity results from an equivocation. It considers a line of argument that would defend the rationality of holding these beliefs, but does not try to prove its soundness.
|
Keywords | Descartes existence of God divine revelation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0739-7046 |
DOI | 10.5840/faithphil19961319 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is the Bible Really Independant Evidence for the Existance of God?Peter Drum - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):373-374.
Commentary on “The Possibility of God”.James Patrick Downey - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):202-206.
Abraham, the Faithless Moral Superhero.Howard J. Curzer - 2007 - Philosophy and Literature 31 (2):344-361.
A Journey Around the Cartesian Circle.Ewing Y. Chinn - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:279-292.
Some Reflections on the Concept of 'Timeless God' in Western Thought.Ismail Cetin - 2009 - Kaygi 12:225 - 234.
The Relation of God and Being in Descartes.Ilyas Altuner - 2012 - Igdir University Journal of Social Sciences (2): 33-51.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-09
Total views
66 ( #151,286 of 2,411,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,815 )
2011-01-09
Total views
66 ( #151,286 of 2,411,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads