Andy Lamey
University of California, San Diego
Equality for Inegalitarians, by George Sher, Cambridge University Press, 2014. Luck egalitarianism has been a leading view in analytic political philosophy since it rose to prominence in the 1980s and 1990s. The theory holds that economic inequalities are acceptable when they are the result of choice but those due to luck should be redistributed away. Proponents generally favour extensive redistribution, on the grounds that luck -- including the luck of being born with a lucrative talent -- plays an extensive role in economic affairs. If libertarians and other defenders of property rights have long appealed to choice and effort as grounds for not redistributing wealth, the novel twist of luck egalitarianism is that it appeals to the same underlying principles, the role of choice, to make the case for extensive redistribution. The term “luck egalitarianism” was coined by a critic, Elizabeth Anderson, who challenged the theory in a famous 1999 article, “What is the Point of Equality?” George Sher’s excellent book picks up where Anderson left off. According to Sher, despite its prominence and many nimble defenders, luck egalitarianism rests on philosophically dubious foundations. We should reject it, Sher argues, in favour of a philosophy that seeks, not to neutralize the role of luck in political and economic life, but one that instead tries to ensure that people are well-enough off to live their lives effectively.
Keywords Equality  Distributive justice  Luck egalitarianism  Sufficientarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09672559.2015.1129741
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equality for Inegalitarians.S. Segall - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):298-301.
Reassessing Egalitarianism.Jeremy Moss - 2014 - Palgrave McMillan.
How to Value Equality.Jeremy Moss - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):187-196.
Ideals of Equality.Andrew Mason (ed.) - 1998 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Forget About Equality.Madison Powers - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
On the Scope and Grounds of Social Equality.Rekha Nath - 2015 - In Fabian Schuppert and Ivo Wallimann-Helmer Edited by Carina Fourie (ed.), Social Equality: Essays on What It Means to be Equals. Oxford University Press. pp. 186-208.


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #147,277 of 59,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #73,769 of 59,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes