Epistemic Responsibility in Business: An Integrative Framework for an Epistemic Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics 183 (1):1-14 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How can we make businesspeople more concerned about the truth of the information they spread or allow to circulate? In this age of ‘fake news’, ‘business bullshit’ and ‘post-truth,’ the issue is of the utmost importance, especially for business trustworthiness in the internet economy. The issue is related to a kind of epistemic responsibility, that consists in accounting for one’s own epistemic wrongdoings, such as making a third party believe something false. Despite growing interest in epistemic misbehavior in the literature of business ethics, the question of epistemic responsibility has been neglected. The aim of this paper is therefore to address this gap, by proposing a notion of epistemic responsibility for business, that may help regulate undesirable epistemic behavior, such as the spreading of false information. To define this notion of epistemic responsibility, I have introduced the concept of epistemic fault. Being epistemically responsible consists in being disposed to account for alleged epistemic faults. This notion of epistemic fault relies on a theoretical framework which combines a typology of eight ‘epistemic values’, a normative stance regarding these values, and a dispositional approach to epistemic virtues and vices. I use this theoretical framework to integrate the various accounts of epistemic virtues and vices found in the literature into a single explanatory scheme. Combined with the notion of epistemic responsibility itself, such an integrative framework should facilitate the practical application of an operational epistemic ethics in business, i.e., the development of virtuous epistemic practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Epistemic responsibility without epistemic agency.Pascal Engel - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):205 – 219.
Epistemic Virtues in Business.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4):583-595.
Epistemic Responsibility.Stephen Hetherington - 2002 - The Monist 85 (3):398-414.
The Epistemic Dimensions of Moral Responsibility and Respect.John Robison - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Standing to epistemically blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):11355-11375.
Responsibility - The Epistemic Condition.Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Utilitarian epistemology.Steve Petersen - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):1173-1184.
Shared Epistemic Responsibility.Boyd Millar - 2021 - Episteme 18 (4):493-506.
There is a distinctively epistemic kind of blame.Cameron Boult - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (3):518-534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-11

Downloads
27 (#591,649)

6 months
13 (#197,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erwan Lamy
Ecole Superieure de Commerce de Paris