Theoreticians as Professional Outsiders: The Modeling Strategies of John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener

In Oren Harman & Michael Dietrich (eds.), Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology. Chicago University Press (2013)
Abstract
Both von Neumann and Wiener were outsiders to biology. Both were inspired by biology and both proposed models and generalizations that proved inspirational for biologists. Around the same time in the 1940s von Neumann developed the notion of self reproducing automata and Wiener suggested an explication of teleology using the notion of negative feedback. These efforts were similar in spirit. Both von Neumann and Wiener used mathematical ideas to attack foundational issues in biology, and the concepts they articulated had lasting effect. But there were significant differences as well. Von Neumann presented a how-possibly model, which sparked interest by mathematicians and computer scientists, while Wiener collaborated more directly with biologists, and his proposal influenced the philosophy of biology. The two cases illustrate different strategies by which mathematicians, the “professional outsiders” of science, can choose to guide their engagement with biological questions and with the biological community, and illustrate different kinds of generalizations that mathematization can contribute to biology. The different strategies employed by von Neumann and Wiener and the types of models they constructed may have affected the fate of von Neumann’s and Wiener’s ideas – as well as the reputation, in biology, of von Neumann and Wiener themselves.
Keywords modeling  generalization  abstraction  systems biology  theoretical biology  teleology  self-replication  cybernetics  purpose
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John von Neumann, Scientific Method and Empirical Economics.Salim Rashid - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):279-294.
That Von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse.Lon Becker - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):121-135.
Von Neumann, Gödel and Complexity Theory.Alasdair Urquhart - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):516-530.
The Von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker.Leah Henderson - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):291-296.
Data Without Models Merging with Models Without Data.Ulrich Krohs & Werner Callebaut - 2007 - In Fred C. Boogerd, Frank J. Bruggeman, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr & Hans V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Elsevier. pp. 181--213.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Yorick Wilks - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):191-195.
Why Numbers Are Sets.Eric Steinhart - 2002 - Synthese 133 (3):343 - 361.
The Birth of Quantum Logic.Miklós Rédei - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2):107-122.
Logical Independence in Quantum Logic.Miklos Redei - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (3):411-422.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-05

Total downloads

34 ( #151,144 of 2,169,111 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #82,344 of 2,169,111 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums