Theoreticians as Professional Outsiders: The Modeling Strategies of John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener
In Oren Harman & Michael Dietrich (eds.), Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology. Chicago University Press (2013)
Both von Neumann and Wiener were outsiders to biology. Both were inspired by biology and both proposed models and generalizations that proved inspirational for biologists. Around the same time in the 1940s von Neumann developed the notion of self reproducing automata and Wiener suggested an explication of teleology using the notion of negative feedback. These efforts were similar in spirit. Both von Neumann and Wiener used mathematical ideas to attack foundational issues in biology, and the concepts they articulated had lasting effect. But there were significant differences as well. Von Neumann presented a how-possibly model, which sparked interest by mathematicians and computer scientists, while Wiener collaborated more directly with biologists, and his proposal influenced the philosophy of biology. The two cases illustrate different strategies by which mathematicians, the “professional outsiders” of science, can choose to guide their engagement with biological questions and with the biological community, and illustrate different kinds of generalizations that mathematization can contribute to biology. The different strategies employed by von Neumann and Wiener and the types of models they constructed may have affected the fate of von Neumann’s and Wiener’s ideas – as well as the reputation, in biology, of von Neumann and Wiener themselves.
|Keywords||modeling generalization abstraction systems biology theoretical biology teleology self-replication cybernetics purpose|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John von Neumann, Scientific Method and Empirical Economics.Salim Rashid - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):279-294.
That Von Neumann Did Not Believe in a Physical Collapse.Lon Becker - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):121-135.
Von Neumann, Gödel and Complexity Theory.Alasdair Urquhart - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):516-530.
The Von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker.Leah Henderson - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):291-296.
Von Neumann's Methodology of Science: From Incompleteness Theorems to Later Foundational Reflections.Giambattista Formica - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (4):480-499.
Data Without Models Merging with Models Without Data.Ulrich Krohs & Werner Callebaut - 2007 - In Fred C. Boogerd, Frank J. Bruggeman, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr & Hans V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Elsevier. pp. 181--213.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Yorick Wilks - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):191-195.
Brown-Von Neumann-Nash Dynamics: The Continuous Strategy Case.Joerg Oechssler, Josef Hofbauer & Frank Riedel - manuscript
Borel Reducibility and Classification of von Neumann Algebras.Román Sasyk & Asger Törnquist - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):169-183.
Bell, Bohm, and von Neumann: Some Philosophical Inequalities Concerning No-Go Theorems and the Axiomatic Method.Michael Stöltzner - 2002 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 37--58.
Artificial Systems as Models in Biological Cybernetics.Titus R. Neumann, Susanne Huber & Heinrich H. Bülthoff - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1071-1072.
Added to index2011-09-05
Total downloads34 ( #151,144 of 2,169,111 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,344 of 2,169,111 )
How can I increase my downloads?