What is nomothetic about “nomothetic” personality research?

Were it one's purpose to set rolling in scornful impatience the eyes of those who currently animate the discipline of personality psychology, one could scarcely do better than to initiate some discussion of the so-called "nomothetic vs. idiographic" controversy, a dispute that has nagged the field for at least the past 50 years. The author has been persuaded that the need for such an analysis will prevail for just so long as it takes the legion but, alas, ersatz "nomotheticists' of personality psychology to finally get it right: The knowledge yielded by conventional' 'nomothetic' personality research has never been, is not now, and will never be nomothetic in any sense of the term to which a personality theorist would be compelled to bow. When all is said and done, it is only this dogma, as fallacious as it is resilient, that has nourished some six decades of "nomothetic" hegemony and, in the process, served repeatedly as the grounds for summarily banishing to their collective corner dispirited critics such as Allport . But while the intimidating hubris of psychometric sophisticates may heretofore have muted many who, in their alleged "romanticism" dared to challenge conventional "nomothetic" wisdom, such browbeating does not dispel ghosts—Teutonic or otherwise. There are certain essentially epistemological problems with which apologists for traditional "nomotheticism" simply must come to grips, and if prior critics of the dominant paradigm failed to articulate those problems adequately , then the struggle must be joined anew, because the problems are genuine and they are not just going to evaporate. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/h0091429
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,625
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Psychology as a Science: Resolving the Idiographic-Nomothetic Controversy.Isaac Franck - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (1):1–20.
Idiographic Vs. Nomothetic Explanation: A Comment on Porpora's Conclusion.Jonathan H. Turner - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (3):273–280.
The Nomothetic Versus the Idiographic Approach to History.Andrzej Malewski & Jerzy Topolski - 2009 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):299-309.
Comments on the Prospects for a Nomothetic Theory of Social Structure.Peter M. Blau - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (3):265–272.
On the Prospects for a Nomothetic Theory of Social Structure.Douglas V. Porpora - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (3):243–264.
Against Laws in the Special Sciences.Jaegwon Kim - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):103-122.
Environmental Antinomianism The Moral World Turned Upside Down?M. Smith - 2000 - Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):125-139.
Self-Consciousness and Aspects of Personality.J. M. Cheeks & S. R. Briggs - 1982 - Journal of Research in Personality 16:401-8.
Ecological Kinds and Ecological Laws.Gregory M. Mikkelson - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1390-1400.
The Descriptive Experience Sampling Method.Russell T. Hurlburt & Sarah A. Akhter - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):271-301.


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #203,991 of 2,242,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #402,164 of 2,242,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature