Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239 (2004)

Authors
Gerald Lang
University of Leeds
Abstract
Act-utilitarianism comes in two standard varieties: ‘subjective’ act-utilitarianism, which tells agents to attempt to maximize utility directly, and ‘objective’ act-utilitarianism, which permits agents to use non-utilitarian decision-making procedures. This article argues that objective actutilitarianism is exposed to a dilemma. On one horn of it is the contention that objective act-utilitarianism makes inconsistent claims about the rightness of acts. On the other horn of it is the contention that objective act-utilitarianism collapses back into what is, essentially, subjective act-utilitarianism. Three objective act-utilitarian responses to this dilemma are explored and rejected. The recommended conclusion is that a consistent utilitarian must either embrace subjective act-utilitarianism, or abandon act-utilitarianism altogether. Key Words: act-utilitarianism • subjective • objective • decision-making procedure • criterion of rightness • dilemma.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X04042966
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Consequentialism and Decision Procedures.Toby Ord - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Oxford

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
116 ( #84,650 of 2,409,938 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #348,054 of 2,409,938 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes