Bayesianism and unification: A reply to Wayne Myrvold

Philosophy of Science 71 (2):205-215 (2004)
Myrvold (2003) has proposed an attractive Bayesian account of why theories that unify phenomena tend to derive greater epistemic support from those phenomena than do theories that fail to unify them. It is argued, however, that "unification" in Myrvold's sense is both too easy and too difficult for theories to achieve. Myrvold's account fails to capture what it is that makes unification sometimes count in a theory's favor.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/383012
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Harmony and Simplicity: Aesthetic Virtues and the Rise of Testability.Rhonda Martens - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):258-266.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #146,118 of 2,164,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums