Don't Feed the Liars! On Fraudulent Memoirs, and Why They're Bad

Philosophy and Literature 46 (1):137-161 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some infamous memoirs have turned out to be chock-full of fibs. Should we care? Why not say—as many have—that all autobiography is fiction, that accurate memory is impossible, that we start lying as soon as we start narrating, and that it doesn’t matter anyway, since made-up stories are just as good as true ones? Because, well, every part of that is misleading. First, we don’t misremember absolutely everything; second, we have other sources to draw on; third, story form affects only significance, not facts; fourth, fiction and nonfiction offer different affordances, benefits, and delights. And since we need both kinds of writing, we have to insist on honesty in memoir; we have to stop saying that everything is invention and that fibs don’t matter. If memoirs could never be trusted, who would still read them? In a world without truth, what exactly would we speak to power?

Similar books and articles

The concise argument.S. Holm - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):65-65.
Feed-forward and the evolution of social behavior.C. N. Slobodchikoff - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):265-266.
Lying, liars and language.David Simpson - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):623-639.
Lying, Liars and Language.David Simpson - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):623-639.
Memoirs of a Semi-detached Australian.John Arthur Passmore - 1997 - Carlton South, Vic.: Melbourne University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-25

Downloads
325 (#59,993)

6 months
139 (#23,227)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Landy
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references