Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions

Cognitive Linguistics 29 (2):313-348 (2018)

Grammatical asymmetries in possessive constructions are overtly coded in about 18% of the world’s languages according to the World Atlas of Language Structures What primarily motivates these grammatical asymmetries is controversial and has been at the crux of the “iconicity vs. frequency” debate This paper contributes to this debate by focusing on the grammatical asymmetries of Paamese possessive constructions, and looking for the primary motivating factor in their multidimensional experiential context. After a careful account of four experiential dimensions of distance, the degrees of experiential distance are shown to systematically correspond to the degrees of formal distance of the possessive constructions used to refer to these experiences. Relevant anthropological and linguistic data concerning Paamese is used to explore whether this correspondence between language and experience is primarily motivated by iconicity or economy. I argue that diagrammatic iconicity is the primary motivating factor for the grammatical asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions, and that economy can account for some, but not all cases. I also show that economy and iconicity can collaborate in motivating some cases, and thus do not necessarily need to be opposed.
Keywords body parts  economy  frequency  iconicity  inalienability  kinship  possession
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/cog-2017-0058
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,305
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.William Croft - 2016 - 27 (4):587-602.
Embodiment, Ownership and Disownership.Frédérique de Vignemont - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):1-12.
.Hans-Jörg Schmid - 2016 - 27 (4):543-557.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Diagrams, Iconicity, and Abductive Discovery.Sami Paavola - 2011 - Semiotica 2011 (186):297-314.
Iconicity and Economy as Creative Forces in Noun-Name Constructions.Angelika Bergien - 2007 - In Christian Todenhagen & Wolfgang Thiele (eds.), Nominalization, Nomination and Naming. Stauffenburg Verlag. pp. 44.
A Complete System of Proof for Diagrammatic Languages.Thomas Russell Lippincott - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Possessive Power.Janet Farrell Smith - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #641,929 of 2,280,229 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #561,475 of 2,280,229 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature