Distributing responsibility in the debate on sustainable biofuels
Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):531-543 (2009)
Abstract
In the perception of technology innovation two world views compete for domination: technological and social determinism. Technological determinism holds that societal change is caused by technological developments, social determinism holds the opposite. Although both were quite central to discussion in the philosophy, history and sociology of technology in the 1970s and 1980s, neither is seen as mainstream now. They do still play an important role as background philosophies in societal debates and offer two very different perspectives on where the responsibilities for an ethically sound development of novel technologies lie. In this paper we will elaborate on these to two opposing views on technology development taking the recent debate on the implementation of biofuels as a case example.DOI
10.1007/s11948-009-9154-1
My notes
Similar books and articles
Beyond Politization of Technology and Sustainability: A Plea for Visioning. [REVIEW]Philip J. Vergragt - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):361-365.
Sustainability Transitions and the Nature of Technology.Erik Paredis - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):195-225.
A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks.Neelke Doorn - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):169-188.
The quiet before the storm: anticipating developments in synthetic biology.Ruth Mampuys & Frans W. A. Brom - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):151-168.
Should technological imperatives be obeyed?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW]Neelke Doorn - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
Recognizing the role of the modern business corporation in the "social construction" of technology.Wade Rowland - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):287 – 313.
What Next after Determinism in the Ontology of Technology? Distributing Responsibility in the Biofuel Debate.Philip Boucher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):525-538.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-07-27
Downloads
32 (#366,818)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2009-07-27
Downloads
32 (#366,818)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What Next after Determinism in the Ontology of Technology? Distributing Responsibility in the Biofuel Debate.Philip Boucher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):525-538.
Bioenergy and Land Use: Framing the Ethical Debate. [REVIEW]C. Gamborg, K. Millar, O. Shortall & P. Sandøe - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):909-925.
References found in this work
The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in Sociology and History of Technology (25th Anniversary Edition with new preface).Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes & Trevor Pinch (eds.) - 1987 - MIT Press.
Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.Langdon Winner - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (3):362-378.
(Re)constructing technological society by taking social construction even more seriously.E. J. Woodhouse - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):199 – 223.
Science, technology and democracy: Perspectives about the complex relation between the scientific community, the scientific journalist and public opinion.Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.