Synthese (2018)

Thomas Land
Ryerson University
Each of Kant’s three Critiques offers an account of the nature of a mental faculty and arrives at this account by means of a procedure I call ‘faculty analysis’. Faculty analysis is often regarded as among the least defensible aspects of Kant’s position; as a consequence, philosophers seeking to inherit Kantian ideas tend to transpose them into a different methodological context. I argue that this is a mistake: in fact faculty analysis is a live option for philosophical inquiry today. My argument is as follows: Faculty analysis is a live option for certain kinds of philosophical theories if so-called “agentialist” views about the nature of belief are correct. There are good reasons for thinking that such views are correct. So faculty analysis should not be dismissed out of hand. Since the first premise in this argument bears a lot of weight, a large part of the paper is devoted to clarifying and defending it, in part by arguing that Kant himself holds a version of agentialism about belief.
Keywords Belief  Faculty psychology  Kant  Spontaneity  Method  Analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-02027-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge.Richard Moran - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):448-454.
Two Kinds of Self‐Knowledge.Matthew Boyle - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):133-164.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reason in its Practical Application.E. Sonny Elizondo - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13:1-17.
Kant on the Faculty of Apperception.Patricia Kitcher - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (3):589-616.
Rede en religie in kentheoretisch perspectief.René van Woudenberg - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (4):653-680.
Kant and the Medical Faculty.John H. Zammito - 2018 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):429-451.
Kant and the Faculty of Feeling.Diane Williamson & Kelly Sorensen (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action.Patrick Frierson - 2005 - Philosophers' Imprint 5:1-34.
The Myth of the Moral Faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
Definitions of Kant’s Categories.Tyke Nunez - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (5-6):631-657.


Added to PP index

Total views
119 ( #78,112 of 2,349,163 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #29,095 of 2,349,163 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes