Feminist Epistemologies of Situated Knowledges: Implications for Rhetorical Argumentation

Informal Logic 30 (3):309-334 (2010)

James Charles Lang
University of Toronto (PhD)
In the process of challenging epistemological assumptions that preclude relationships between knowers and the objects of knowing, feminist epistemologists Lorraine Code and Donna Haraway also can be interpreted as troubling forms of argumentation predicated on positivist-derived logic. Against the latter, Christopher Tindale promotes a rhetorical model of argument that appears able to better engage epistemologies of situated knowledges. I detail key features of the latter from Code, especially, and compare and contrast them with relevant parts of Tindale’s discussion of context on the rhetorical model, and I suggest ways that his work could be expanded to accommodate rhetorical implications of situated knowledges
Keywords argumentation, Code, feminist theory, rhetorical argumentation, situated knowledges, Tindale
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,462
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. KANT - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Coalescent Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.Christian Kock - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):437-464.
Towards Computational Rhetoric.Floriana Grasso - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #400,648 of 2,273,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #64,810 of 2,273,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature