Erkenntnis 62 (3):321-351 (2005)

Abstract
John Taurek famously argued that, in ‘conflict cases’, where we are confronted with a smaller and a larger group of individuals, and can choose which group to save from harm, we should toss a coin, rather than saving the larger group. This is primarily because coin-tossing is fairer: it ensures that each individual, regardless of the group to which he or she belongs, has an equal chance of being saved. This article provides a new response to Taurek’s argument. It proposes that there are two possible types of unfairness that have to be avoided in conflict cases, as far as possible: ‘selection unfairness’, which is the unfairness of not giving individuals an equal chance of being saved; and ‘outcome unfairness’, which is the unfairness of not actually saving them, when others are saved. Since saving the greater number generates less outcome unfa-irness than coin-tossing, it is argued that, in many conflict cases, fairness demands that we save the greater number.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Ethics   Logic   Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-004-4499-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Should the Numbers Count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Equal Justice.Eric Rakowski - 1991 - Oxford University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Numbers Scepticism, Equal Chances and Pluralism: Taurek Revisited.Gerald Lang & Rob Lawlor - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):298-315.
In Defense of Batman: Reply to Bradley.Gerald Lang & Rob Lawlor - 2013 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (3):1-7.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Unscrambling of Life and Death of Confucius.Zhongqi Yang - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (3):167-179.
A Little Dialogue On Life And Death.Fulvio Tessitore - 2010 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 23.
Causing Death or Allowing to Die? Developments in the Law.P. R. Ferguson - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):368-372.
Well-Being and Death.Ben Bradley - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Fairness Between Competing Claims.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
Euthanasia and the Quality of Life Debate.J. Breck - 1995 - Christian Bioethics 1 (3):322-337.
Current Debate on the Ethical Issues of Brain Death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
69 ( #149,677 of 2,433,126 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,180 of 2,433,126 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes