How to consult an expert? Opinion versus evidence

Theory and Decision 70 (4):447-474 (2011)

In this article, two modes of non-binding communication between an expert and a decision-maker are compared. They are distinguished mainly by the nature of the information transmitted by the expert. In the first one, the expert reports only his opinion (soft information) concerning the desirability of a certain action, whereas in the second one, he is consulted to provide evidence (hard information) to convince the decision-maker. The expert’s ability to provide evidence increases with the precision of his information. The article shows that requiring evidence is always beneficial to the decision-maker whereas it is beneficial to the expert, if and only if the preferences of both agents are different enough
Keywords Decision making  Opinion  Evidence  Sender–Receiver game
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11238-009-9177-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Epistemology of Scientific Evidence.Douglas Walton & Nanning Zhang - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):173-219.
Conhecimento por especialista, evidência e informação.Tommaso Piazza - 2010 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 55 (2):42-59.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #287,254 of 2,311,559 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #517,694 of 2,311,559 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature