Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):212–224 (2007)

Authors
Simon Langford
United Arab Emirates University
Abstract
David Lewis's cohabitation theory suffered damaging criticism from Derek Parfit. Though many have defended versions of Lewis's theory Parfit's criticism has not been answered. This paper shows how to defend the cohabitation theory against Parfit's criticism.
Keywords Cohabitation  David Lewis  Parfit
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.480.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Survival and Identity.David K. Lewis - 1976 - In Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons. University of California Press. pp. 17-40.
Personal Identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
All the World’s a Stage.Theodore Sider - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):433 – 453.
Lewis, Perry, and What Matters.Derek Parfit - 1976 - In Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons. University of California Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Attention and Perceptual Content.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):263-270.
Utility Monsters for the Fission Age.Rachael Briggs & Daniel Nolan - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):392-407.
Mathematical Induction and Explanation.Alan Baker - 2010 - Analysis 70 (4):681-689.
Persistence and Determination.Katherine Hawley - 2008 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:197-212.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
107 ( #100,612 of 2,449,124 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,981 of 2,449,124 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes