How to defend the cohabitation theory

Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):212–224 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

David Lewis's cohabitation theory suffered damaging criticism from Derek Parfit. Though many have defended versions of Lewis's theory Parfit's criticism has not been answered. This paper shows how to defend the cohabitation theory against Parfit's criticism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
111 (#114,194)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Langford
United Arab Emirates University

References found in this work

Survival and identity.David K. Lewis - 1976 - In Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons. University of California Press. pp. 17-40.
Personal identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
All the World’s a Stage.Theodore Sider - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):433 – 453.
Personal Identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references