Kantian Review (forthcoming)

Authors
David Landy
San Francisco State University
Abstract
Scholars working on Kant’s Anticipations of Perception generally attribute to Kant an argument that invalidly infers that objects have degrees of intensive magnitude from the purported fact that sensations do. I argue that this rests on an incorrect disambiguation of Kant’s use of Empfindung (sensation) as referring to the mental states that are our sensings, rather than the objects that are thereby sensed. Kant’s real argument runs as follows. There is a difference between a representation of an empty region of space and/or time and a representation of that same region as occupied by an object. Both have the same extensive magnitude. Thus, in addition to their extensive magnitude, objects must be represented as having a qualitative matter. This implies the possibility of varying an object’s (intensive) magnitude independently of variations in its extensive magnitude. Since it is the presence of sensation in a cognition that marks the difference between representing only the spatiotemporal form (extensive magnitude) of the object and representing the object as a whole, it is sensation that represents its intensive magnitude.
Keywords Anticipations  Intensive Magnitude  Sensation  Perception  Matter  Continuity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Concept of Force.Melissa Zinkin - 1999 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
Kant on the Soul’s Intensity.Kirill Chepurin - 2010 - Kant Yearbook 2 (1):75-94.
Hume and the Perception of Spatial Magnitude.Edward Slowik - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):355 - 373.
Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude, and the Unity of Perception.Sacha Golob - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):505-528.
Spatial Representation, Magnitude and the Two Stems of Cognition.Thomas Land - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (5-6):524-550.
Sensations as Representations in Kant.Tim Jankowiak - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):492-513.
Action-Oriented Representation.Pete Mandik - 2005 - In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 284--305.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-29

Total views
76 ( #125,144 of 2,349,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #39,070 of 2,349,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes