Kant's phenomena: Extrinsic or relational properties? A reply to Allais


Authors
Rae Langton
Cambridge University
Abstract
Kant’s claim that we are ignorant of things in themselves is a claim that we cannot know ‘the intrinsic nature of things’, or so at least I argued in Kantian Humility.2 I’m delighted to find that Lucy Allais is in broad agreement with this core idea, thinking it represents, at the very least, a part of Kant’s view. She sees some of the advantages of this interpretation. It has significant textual support. It does justice to Kant’s sense that we are missing out on something, in our failure to know things as they are in themselves. And it makes tellable, after all, Kant’s at first sight untellable tale, about the knowable existence of unknowable things: for we can know that things exist, without knowing what their intrinsic properties are. However, Allais is critical of the way I fill out this core idea, and she has an alternative to offer. She thinks Kant’s distinction between things in themselves and phenomena is not a distinction between two kinds of properties, intrinsic and relational. She is critical of my interpretation of causal powers, which I take to be the relevant relational properties: my idea, first, that causal powers are in fact relational properties; second, that causal powers are only contingently associated with intrinsic properties, so that creating substances with intrinsic properties is insufficient for creating causal power; and, third, that intrinsic properties are causally inert. Her criticisms of these three ideas..
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00609.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,938
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Contours of Control.Joshua Shepherd - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):395-411.
Allais on Transcendental Idealism.Andrew F. Roche - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (3):351-374.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Causation by Relational Properties.Wim De Muijnck - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):123-137.
Intrinsic Properties.Theodore Sider - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 83 (1):1 - 27.
Properties, Causation, and Projectibility: Reply to Shoemaker.Richard Swinburne - 1980 - In L. J. Cohen & M. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 313-20.
Maximality and Intrinsic Properties.Theodore Sider - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):357 - 364.
Do Relations Require Underlying Intrinsic Properties? A Physical Argument for a Metaphysics of Relations.Michael Esfeld - 2003 - Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 4 (1):5-25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
157 ( #41,617 of 2,319,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #175,176 of 2,319,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature