Leibniz's Best World Claim Restructured

American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):57-84 (2010)
Authors
Abstract
Leibniz claimed that the universe, if God-created, would be physically and morally optimal in this conjoint sense: Of all possible worlds, it would be richest in phenomena, but its richness would arise from the simplest physical laws and conditions. This claim raises two difficult questions. First, why would this “richest/simplest” world be morally optimal? Second, what is the optimal balance between these competing criteria? The latter question is especially hard to answer in the context of a multiverse or multi-domain universe. Leibniz focused on goodness as God’s motive in creation. “This is the cause of the existence of the best: that his wisdom makes it known to God, his goodness makes him choose it, and his power lets him produce it.” This article suggests that love is God’s motive. Since love entails acting to both benefit and be with the beloved, limitless love would entail God’s becoming as much unified reality as possible. The physical laws that govern the universe and its vast richness of phenomena appear to be those that we should expect if this claim is true and there are ways of testing the closeness of this fit. The claim that God has become the world (pandeism) also offers a satisfying resolution to the problem of evil.
Keywords Leibniz  pandeism  natural theology  information  richness  simplicity  problem of evil  multiverse  weak anthropic principle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

He Who Lapse Last Lapse Best: Plantinga on Leibniz 'Lapse'.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (1):137-146.
Leibniz on Compossibility.James Messina & Donald Rutherford - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):962-977.
Leibniz, Creation and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Jesse R. Steinberg - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):123 - 133.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Time Unbounded.Michael J. Futch - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):321-334.
Newton, Spinoza, Stoics and Others.Mark A. Kulstad - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:81-121.
Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-26

Total views
233 ( #23,096 of 2,312,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #19,457 of 2,312,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature