American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):57-84 (2010)
Authors | |
Abstract |
Leibniz claimed that the universe, if God-created, would be physically and morally optimal in this conjoint sense: Of all possible worlds, it would be richest in phenomena, but its richness would arise from the simplest physical laws and conditions. This claim raises two difficult questions. First, why would this “richest/simplest” world be morally optimal? Second, what is the optimal balance between these competing criteria? The latter question is especially hard to answer in the context of a multiverse or multi-domain universe. Leibniz focused on goodness as God’s motive in creation. “This is the cause of the existence of the best: that his wisdom makes it known to God, his goodness makes him choose it, and his power lets him produce it.” This article suggests that love is God’s motive. Since love entails acting to both benefit and be with the beloved, limitless love would entail God’s becoming as much unified reality as possible. The physical laws that govern the universe and its vast richness of phenomena appear to be those that we should expect if this claim is true and there are ways of testing the closeness of this fit. The claim that God has become the world (pandeism) also offers a satisfying resolution to the problem of evil.
|
Keywords | Leibniz pandeism natural theology information richness simplicity problem of evil multiverse weak anthropic principle |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection of the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.Charles Darwin - 1859 - Norton.
View all 42 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
“He Who Lapse Last Lapse Best”: Plantinga on Leibniz’s Lapse.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (1):137-146.
Leibniz on Compossibility.James Messina & Donald Rutherford - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):962-977.
Leibniz, Creation and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Jesse R. Steinberg - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):123 - 133.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Extrinsic Denominations and Universal Expression in Leibniz.Ari Maunu - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (1):83-97.
Time Unbounded: Leibniz on Infinite Temporal Regresses.Michael J. Futch - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):321-334.
Plagiat an Leibniz' historiographischem Werk? Rekonstruktion frühmittelalterlicher Adelsgeschichte bei G. W. Leibniz und J. G. Eckhart. 1. Teil. [REVIEW]Sven Erdner - 2003 - Studia Leibnitiana 35 (2):194 - 224.
Why Shouldn’T Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Miracles in the Best of All Possible Worlds: Leibniz's Dilemma and Leibniz's Razor.Gregory Brown - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1):19-39.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-10-26
Total views
461 ( #19,882 of 2,499,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,198 of 2,499,417 )
2013-10-26
Total views
461 ( #19,882 of 2,499,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,198 of 2,499,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads