Martha Lang
College of DuPage
The central goal of this article is to make the case that the revamped version of Michael Bishop’s Network Theory of Well-being, described in his 2015 book The Good Life: Unifying the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being, provides a worthwhile framework for philosophical counseling endeavors, including Logic-Based Therapy. In 2017, The Network Theory of Well-Being, Revamped emerged as a response to Bishop’s theory of well-being; the revamped version was also my dissertation, which I successfully defended and published that year. By appealing to a set of counter-examples, I argue that Bishop’s theory is missing an essential component; his positive causal network model of well-being allows for sever­al problematic cases which, upon investigation, demonstrate positive causal networks but cannot reasonably be considered examples of well-being. In revamping Network Theory, I argue that three additional criteria are required for well-being: authenticity, a bit of moral­ity, and some objective information. Altogether, these three criteria comprise what I call holistic authenticity. As such, the emergent theory of well-being declares that well-being is a matter of instantiating a holistically authentic positive causal network. This theory of well-being is the most reasonable notion of well-being for philosophical counseling because it is based on Network Theory’s inclusive method, which requires that the philosophy of well-being join forces with the science of well-being.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ijpp2018442
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Extending the Network Perspective on Comorbidity.Brian D. Haig & Frances M. Vertue - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):158-158.
The Network Theory of Well-Being: An Introduction.Michael Bishop - 2012 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7.
Philosophical Counseling: An Almost Alternative Paradigm.Sara Waller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (2):23-31.
The Theory and Practice of Philosophical Counseling.Bernard Li - 2004 - Philosophy and Culture 31 (1):3-22.
Bruno Latour and Actor-Network-Theory.Bozidar Filipovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):129-149.
What Else Can You Do With Philosophy Besides Teach?Elliot D. Cohen - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 3 (3):31-40.
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Playing with Networks: How Economists Explain. [REVIEW]Caterina Marchionni - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):331-352.
The Anatomy of Network Failure.Andrew Schrank & Josh Whitford - 2011 - Sociological Theory 29 (3):151-177.
A More Philosophical Model Of Counseling.Young Rhee - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (1):35-48.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,508,795 of 2,455,350 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,350 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes