David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):39-50 (2004)
Are we really in need of (new) ethical institutions that regulate and control the ethical quality of corporate behavior? The various scandals (Enron, WorldOnline, Ahold) prove that ethical institutions, as well as deontological codes, public social commitments, social annual reports directly linked to financial overviews, are not enough to prevent fraud, corruption or bribery. Does the existence of those institutions partly provoke and legitimize the unbridled and immense power of organizational and CEO-(non-ethical) behavior and window-dressing? Do we need more separate ethical institutions? Is it possible to outsource the competence of an ethical corporate and personal moral responsibility to another, separate institution? Do people and corporations still feel the confrontation with moral dilemmas with the institutionalizing of a part of that responsibility to an anonymous body? And won't this ethical control lead to a further alienation of the micro level personal responsibility to the macro performance of the market and organizations? This article focuses on the counterpart of the institution: tomorrow's stakeholder. The stakeholder of tomorrow (the manager, the CEO, the consumer, the employee, the civil servant...) embodies the complexity of the multi-paradigmatic business ethics debate. Two aspects of tomorrow's stakeholders' presence will be discussed: their moral attitude and emancipative communication.
|Keywords||ethos critical attitude “parrèsia” stakeholders ethical institutions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ghislain Deslandes (2012). The Care-of-Self Ethic with Continual Reference to Socrates: Towards Ethical Self-Management. Business Ethics 21 (4):325-338.
Ghislain Deslandes (2012). The Care-of-Self Ethic with Continual Reference to Socrates: Towards Ethical Self-Management. Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (4):325-338.
Similar books and articles
J. Neubert Mitchell (forthcoming). The Effects of Ethical Codes on Ethical Perceptions of Actions Toward Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics.
Robert Elliott Allinson (2004). Circles Within a Circle: The Condition for the Possibility of Ethical Business Institutions Within a Market System. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):17-28.
Craig E. Johnson (2012). Organizational Ethics: A Practical Approach. Sage Publications.
Jerry D. Goodstein & Andrew C. Wicks (2007). Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility: Making Business Ethics a Two-Way Conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):375-398.
Anthony J. Daboub & Jerry M. Calton (2002). Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):85 - 98.
John M. T. Balmer, Shaun M. Powell & Stephen A. Greyser (2011). Explicating Ethical Corporate Marketing. Insights From the BP Deepwater Horizon Catastrophe: The Ethical Brand That Exploded and Then Imploded. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):1-14.
Min-Dong Paul Lee (2011). Configuration of External Influences: The Combined Effects of Institutions and Stakeholders on Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):281-298.
Norman E. Bowie (2005). Management Ethics. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #313,307 of 1,925,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,152 of 1,925,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?