Rawlsian Incentives and the Freedom Objection

Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):231-249 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


One Rawlsian response to G. A. Cohen’s criticisms of justice as fairness which Cohen canvasses, and then dismisses, is the 'Freedom Objection'. It comes in two versions. The 'First Version' asserts that there is an unresolved trilemma among the three principles of equality, Pareto-optimality, and freedom of occupational choice, while the 'Second Version' imputes to Rawls’s theory a concern to protect occupational freedom over equality of condition. This article is mainly concerned with advancing three claims. First, the 'ethical solution' Cohen advances against the First Version of the Freedom Objection does not grant a fair hearing to the Freedom Objection. Second, the distinction Cohen presses between the legal and moral right of occupational choice in his response to the Second Version cannot save him from worries about Stalinist coercion. Third, Cohen’s response to the First Version of the Freedom Objection is actually in tension with his response to the Second Version of the Freedom Objection.

Similar books and articles

Grounding the Luck Objection.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (1):127-138.
Comment on Andrew Walton.Carina Fourie - 2013 - Analyse & Kritik 35 (1):187-192.
Justice and a citizens' basic income.Colin Farrelly - 1999 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (3):283–296.
Rethinking the ethics of incentives.Ruth W. Grant - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (3):354-372.
Molinism and Supercomprehension: Grounding Counterfactual Truth.John David Laing - 2000 - Dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Abortion and conscientious objection.Daniel J. Hill - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):344-350.


Added to PP

359 (#33,996)

6 months
61 (#26,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerald Lang
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Defining the duty to contribute: Against the market solution.Markus Furendal - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (4):469-488.
Sharing Burdensome Work.Jan Kandiyali - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (1):143-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references