Teaching Ethics 19 (1):17-34 (2019)

Authors
Elizabeth Lanphier
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Abstract
In this paper, we propose some ways in which teaching thought experiments in an ethics classroom may result in marginalizing or excluding students underrepresented in philosophy. Although thought experiments are designed to strip away details and pump intuitions, we argue that they may reinforce assumptions and stereotypes. As examples, we discuss several well-known thought experiments that may typically be included in undergraduate ethics courses, such as Bernard Williams’s Gauguin and Derek Parfit’s The Young Girl’s Child. We analyze the potential value and dangers or teaching these thought experiments. We conclude with some practical suggestions for how to teach thought experiments in ways that encourage students to expand their moral imaginations and think critically about their own assumptions and the assumptions built into thought experiments.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Teaching Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1544-4031
DOI 10.5840/tej202022771
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Moderate Defence of the Use of Thought Experiments in Applied Ethics.Adrian Walsh - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):467-481.
Teaching Business Ethics with Experiments.Matthias Uhl & Christoph Lütge - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 15:203-217.
Thought Experiments in Aesthetics.Paisley Nathan Livingston & Carl Mikael Pettersson - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, K. Browniee & D. Coady (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Applied Philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
Analysing Thought Experiments.Jan Willem Wieland & Matthijs Endt - 2017 - Teaching Philosophy 40 (3):367-383.
Thought Experiments in Ethics.Georg Brun - 2017 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. pp. 195–210.
Thought Experiments and a priori Knowledge.Vladimir Filatov - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):17-27.
Thought Experiments in Aesthetics.Paisley Livingston & Mikael Pettersson - 2016 - In K. Brownlee, D. Coady & K. Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Applied Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 501–513.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-16

Total views
15 ( #682,703 of 2,461,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,097 of 2,461,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes