The logical structure of linguistic commitment I: Four systems of non-relevant commitment entailment [Book Review]

&
Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):369 - 400 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01048687

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Too much ado about belief.Jérôme Dokic & Elisabeth Pacherie - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):185-200.
The logical structure of linguistic commitment III Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility.Mark Lance - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (5):439-464.
What is a logic translation?Till Mossakowski, Răzvan Diaconescu & Andrzej Tarlecki - 2009 - Logica Universalis 3 (1):95-124.
The semantics of existence.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):31-63.
Moral Commitment and Moral Theory.Sarah Stroud - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:381-398.
Is scientific theory-commitment doxastic or practical?Ward E. Jones - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):325 - 344.
Two kinds of ontological commitment.Howard Peacock - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):79-104.
Commitment, Justification, and the Rejection of Natural Theology.Brendan Sweetman - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):417-436.
Naess's pluralistic metaphilosophy1.Ingemund Gullvåg - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):391-408.
The logical structure of linguistic commitment II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment. [REVIEW]Mark Lance & Philip Kremer - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (4):425 - 449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#246,899)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mark Lance
Georgetown University
Philip Kremer
University of Toronto at Scarborough

Citations of this work

Meaning as an inferential role.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (1):1-35.
Subjective probability and acceptance.Mark Norris Lance - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (1):147 - 179.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Science, Perception and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) - 1963 - New York,: Humanities Press.
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Nuel D. Belnap & J. Michael Dunn.
Asserting.Robert Brandom - 1983 - Noûs 17 (4):637-650.
Symbolic logic.Frederic Brenton Fitch - 1952 - New York,: Ronald Press Co..

View all 12 references / Add more references