Journal of Moral Education 47 (1):34-47 (2018)
Abstract |
Moral foundation theory posits that specific moral transgressions elicit specific moral emotions. To test this claim, participants were asked to rate their emotions in response to moral violation vignettes. We found that compassion and disgust were associated with care and purity respectively as predicted by moral foundation theory. However, anger, rage, contempt, resentment and fear were not associated to any single moral transgression. Thus, even though the type of moral violation matters for the type of emotion that is elicited, the link between moral foundations and moral emotions seems more complex than moral foundation theory suggests. Rather, the findings suggest that there are both emotion-specific foundations and emotion-unspecific foundations.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/03057240.2017.1350569 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Mapping the Moral Domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.Jonathan Haidt - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):814-834.
When Ignorance is No Excuse: Different Roles for Intent Across Moral Domains.Liane Young & Rebecca Saxe - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):202-214.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Whistleblowing and the ‘Person-Situation’ Conundrum: What Matters More?Meenal Gakhar & Zubin R. Mulla - 2021 - Journal of Human Values 27 (3):247-260.
Emotions as Guardians of Group Norms: Expressions of Anger and Disgust Drive Inferences About Autonomy and Purity Violations.Marc W. Heerdink, Lukas F. Koning, Evert A. van Doorn & Gerben A. van Kleef - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):563-578.
Negative Affective States and Moral Judgment: A Closer Look at Their Joint Involvement.W. Pitt Derryberry, Sarah Richardson, Anna Simpson, Megan Wilson & Andrea Ambam - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Education:1-17.
Using Frankenstein-Themed Science Activities for Science Ethics Education: An Exploratory Study.Areej Mawasi, Peter Nagy, Ed Finn & Ruth Wylie - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Education:1-17.
Similar books and articles
Educating Moral Emotions or Moral Selves: A False Dichotomy?Kristján Kristjánsson - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (4):397-409.
The Role of Emotions in Moral Case Deliberation: Theory, Practice, and Methodology.Bert Molewijk, Dick Kleinlugtenbelt & Guy Widdershoven - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (7):383-393.
Varieties of Moral Emotional Experience.Hanah A. Chapman & Adam K. Anderson - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):255-257.
Psychopathy: The Incapacity to Have Moral Emotions.Ben Spiecker - 1988 - Journal of Moral Education 17 (2):98-104.
Emotion, Moral Perception, and Character.Charles B. Starkey - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Reflections on Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning Toward an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Approach to Moral Cognition.Wayne Christensen & John Sutton - 2012 - In Robyn Langdon & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning. Psychology Press. pp. 327-347.
Nothing More Than Feelings? The Role of Emotions in Moral Judgment.David Pizarro - 2000 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (4):355–375.
A Developmental Perspective on Moral Emotions.Tina Malti & Sebastian P. Dys - 2015 - Topoi 34 (2):453-459.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-06
Total views
28 ( #406,147 of 2,499,821 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,687 of 2,499,821 )
2017-08-06
Total views
28 ( #406,147 of 2,499,821 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,687 of 2,499,821 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads