The persistence of counterexample: Re-examining the debate over Leibniz law

Noûs 25 (1):43-61 (1991)

Authors
Gregory Landini
University of Iowa
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2216092
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,715
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Identity and Indiscernibility.K. Hawley - 2009 - Mind 118 (469):101-119.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Modal Objection to Naive Leibnizian Identity.Dale Jacquette - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (2):107 - 118.
Leibniz and Locke and the Debate Over Species.Jan-Erik Jones - 2006 - In François Duchesneau & Jérémie Girard (eds.), Leibniz selon les Nouxeaux Essais sur l'entendement Humain. Vrin & Bellarmin.
Leibniz.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy.By Benjamin Schnieder - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
39 ( #204,369 of 2,243,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #813,811 of 2,243,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature