The semantic structure of evolutionary biology as an argument against intelligent design

Zygon 46 (1):26-46 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract. This paper examines the impact of two formalizations of evolutionary biology on the antiselectionist critiques of the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. It looks first at attempts to apply the syntactic framework of the physical sciences to biology in the twentieth century, and to their effect upon the ID movement. It then examines the more heuristic account of biological-theory structure, namely, the semantic model. Finally, it concludes by advocating the semantic conception and emphasizing the problems that the semantic model creates for ID's negative and positive theses

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is wrong with intelligent design?Elliott Sober - 2007 - Quarterly Review of Biology 82 (1):3-8.
There is no Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology.Francisco J. Ayala - 2009 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp, Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 364–390.
The Structure of Biological Theories.Paul Thompson - 1989 - State University of New York Press.
Explanation in the Semantic Conception of Theory Structure.Paul Thompson - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:286 - 296.
Darwinism, design, and public education.John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.) - 2003 - East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-24

Downloads
124 (#180,092)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Lancaster
Appalachian State University

Citations of this work

Add more citations