American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):38-40 (2021)

Authors
Elizabeth Lanphier
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Abstract
Not only is deception commonplace in medical encounters, according to Christopher Meyers (2021), but the clinical ethicist might have moral obligations to support and even enact deception. Descriptively Meyers is right that there are “opportunistic, self-interested and benevolent reasons” for deception through omission and commission in clinical medicine. But it is possible to retain this premise while rejecting the normative conclusion that the clinical ethicist “should sometimes be an active participant in the deception of patients and families.” One reason to reject the normative conclusion is its incompatibility with providing trauma informed ethics consultation (TIEC). In the TIEC framework I developed with Uchenna Anani, we defend the integration of trauma informed care (TIC) into ethics consultation (Lanphier and Anani 2021). While ethicists narrowly attend to the question and scope of the ethics consults made to them, doing so in alignment with trauma informed principles is tantamount to providing good ethics consultation. According to Meyers, the clinical ethicist is an “advocate for the best ethical choices.” The best ethical choices are also trauma informed ones.
Keywords Clinical Ethics Consultation  Trauma Informed Care  Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2021.1906992
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.Elizabeth Lanphier & Uchenna E. Anani - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-13.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.Elizabeth Lanphier & Uchenna E. Anani - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-13.
Openness and Trust in Data-Intensive Science: The Case of Biocuration.Ane Møller Gabrielsen - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (3):497-504.
Calvin and the Duty to Respect a Patient's Trust.D. T. Ball - 2014 - Christian Bioethics 20 (1):112-122.
Using Informed Consent to Save Trust.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):437-444.
Trust and Autonomous Agency.Marina Oshana - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (3):431-447.
Regulating Trust in Pediatric Clinical Trials.Wim Pinxten, Herman Nys & Kris Dierickx - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):439-444.
Trust as Robustly Moral.Alisa Carse - 2010 - Philosophic Exchange 40 (1).
Informed Consent, the Value of Trust, and Hedons.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):447-447.
Transparency: Informed Consent in Primary Care.Howard Brody - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (5):5-9.
Trust but Verify.Sissela Bok - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):446-446.
Is Informed Consent Effective in Trauma Patients?A. Bhangu, E. Hood, A. Datta & S. Mangaleshkar - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):780-782.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-05

Total views
2 ( #1,416,013 of 2,454,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,471 of 2,454,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes