European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):507-524 (2013)
In a recent paper, Robert Hanna argues that Kant's incongruent counterparts example can be mobilized to show that some mental representations, which represent complex states of affairs as complex, do so entirely non-conceptually. I will argue that Hanna is right to see that Kant uses incongruent counterparts to show that there must be a non-conceptual component to cognition, but goes too far in concluding that there must be entirely non-conceptual representations that represent objects as existing in space and time. Kant is deeply committed to the thesis that no representation of a complex state of affairs as complex can be entirely non-conceptual. For Kant, all representations of complex states of affairs as complex (including those of incongruent counterparts) are conceptually structured. I present an interpretation of the Transcendental Aesthetic according to which Kant not only aims at Leibnizian and Newtonian accounts of space and time, but also Hume's. Hume's account fails to make representations of complex states of affairs sufficiently determinate. Kant offers an account later in the Critique that is meant to correct this failing by requiring that all representations of complex states of affairs as complex be conceptually (inferentially) structured
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars.John Henry McDowell - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality.Robert Brandom - 2002 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Three Remarks on the Interpretation of Kant on Incongruent Counterparts.Rogério Passos Severo - 2005 - Kantian Review 9 (1):30-57.
Incongruent Counterparts and Modal Relationism.Carolyn Brighouse - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):53 – 68.
A Puzzle About Incongruent Counterparts and the Critique of Pure Reason.Rogério Passos Severo - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):507–521.
Temporally Incongruent Counterparts.Hud Hudson - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):337 - 343.
Incongruent Counterparts and the Reality of Space.Graham Nerlich - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):598-613.
A Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts.Paul Rusnock & Rolf George - 1995 - Kant-Studien 86 (3):257-277.
Kant on Incongruent Counterparts.William Harper - 1991 - In James Van Cleve & Robert E. Frederick (eds.), The Philosophy of Right and Left. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 263-313.
Incongruent Counterparts and the Refutation of Idealism.Hoke Robinson - 1981 - Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):391-397.
Kant's Uses of the Argument From Incongruent Counterparts.Mark Hulbert - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (2):110-113.
A Remark on Kant's Argument From Incongruent Counterparts.Jeremy Byrd - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):789 – 800.
Kant's Hands, Spatial Orientation, and the Copernican Turn.Peter Woelert - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):139-150.
On the Mereological Structure of Complex States of Affairs.Thomas Mormann - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):403-418.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads46 ( #112,442 of 2,163,896 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,637 of 2,163,896 )
How can I increase my downloads?