Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):621-639 (1991)
Abstract |
This essay examines the arguments for and against working towards the objective of human germ line engineering for medical purposes. Germ line changes which result as a secondary consequence of other well designed and ethically acceptable manipulations of somatic cells to cure an otherwise fatal disease can be seen as acceptable. More serious objections apply to intentional germ line interventions because of the unacceptability of using a person solely as a vehicle for creating uncertain genetic change in his descendants. It is also morally unacceptable to use the promise of future benefit to experiment on fetuses or embryos when other more effective technologies exist to help parents have healthy children. Using new genetic technologies to select desirable genotypes among gametes is less problematic and affords a promising new technique for avoiding intergenerational harms. Keywords: embryo research, germ line manipulation, intergenerational ethics, secondary germ line effects CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/jmp/16.6.621 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
Germ-Line Enhancement of Humans and Nonhumans.J. Robert Loftis - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):57-76.
Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering.Martin Gunderson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):87-102.
Altering Humans—The Case For and Against Human Gene Therapy.Nils Holtug - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):157-174.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Debunking the Slippery Slope Argument Against Human Germ-Line Gene Therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Commentary: How Do We Think About the Ethics of Human Germ-Line Genetic Therapy?Kathleen Nolan - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):613-619.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
Human Germ-Line Therapy: The Case for its Development and Use.Burke K. Zimmerman - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):593-612.
Germ-Line Enhancement of Humans and Nonhumans.J. Robert Loftis - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):57-76.
Germ-Line Gene Therapy and the Clinical Ethos of Medical Genetics.Gregory Fowler, Eric T. Juengst & Burke K. Zimmerman - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (2).
Commentary: Maintaining the Somatic/Germ-Line Distinction: Some Ethical Drawbacks.Ray Moseley - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):641-647.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-22
Total views
95 ( #103,683 of 2,403,526 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #197,513 of 2,403,526 )
2010-08-22
Total views
95 ( #103,683 of 2,403,526 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #197,513 of 2,403,526 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads