Biological Theory 6 (1):48-58 (2011)

Authors
Lucie Laplane
CNRS, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
Abstract
The tacit standard view that development ends once reproductive capacity is acquired (reproductive boundary, or ‘‘RB,’’ thesis) has recently been challenged by biologists and philosophers of biology arguing that development continues until death (death boundary, or ‘‘DB,’’ thesis). The relevance of these two theses is difficult to assess because the fact that there is no precise definition of development makes the determination of its temporal boundaries problematic. Taking into account this difficulty, this article tries to develop a new species-dependent perspective on temporal boundaries of development. This species-dependent account stands against both RB and DB theses since neither of them reflects the differences between species in the temporality of their development. In this perspective, I propose to use stem cells as a tool to analyze (1) the different developmental capacities of an organism during its life; and (2) the different developmental temporal capacities between species. In particular, I will show that stem cells enable four distinct temporal developmental patterns to be distinguished, i.e., four distinct temporal boundaries of development in the living. I show how these four patterns can be interpreted differently depending on the perspective one has on the definition of development.
Keywords Asexual reproduction  Boundary  Definition  Development  Differentiation  Division  Regeneration  Stem cells
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13752-011-0009-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,178
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Functional Analysis.Robert Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Developmental Scaffolding.Franco Giorgi & Luis E. Bruni - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (2):173-189.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Norman Ford - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (4):4.
Stem Cells, Altered Nuclear Transfer & Ethics.Norman Ford - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):9.
Social Experiments in Stem Cell Biology.Melinda B. Fagan - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):235-262.
Crossing Species Boundaries.Jason Scott Robert & Françoise Baylis - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):1 – 13.
Stem Cell Technology Update.Mariam Ghosn & Ford - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):10.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Células Troncales: Aspectos Científicos-Filosóficos y Jurídicos.Ingrid Brena Sesma (ed.) - 2005 - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Species as Individuals.Berit Brogaard - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):223-242.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
123 ( #88,090 of 2,455,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes