Authors
Eric LaRock
Oakland University
Abstract
Examining the literature on Aristotelian psychology can leave one with the impression that his theory of perception and emotion is credible primarily because it accords with contemporary functionalism, a physicalist theory that has achieved orthodoxy in contemporary philosophy of mind. In my view, squeezing Aristotle into a functionalist mold is a mistake, for functionalism entaiIs at least two theses that Aristotle would reject: (1) that material types make no essential difference to perception and emotion (and to mental states in general), and (2) that mental states are reducible to functional states of matter (a reductionism of the token-specific sort). Against these functionalist theses, Aristotle would include within his analysis of human perception and emotion (and other psychological activities) the biological material and the characteristic operations associated with it. Although Aristotle would insist that this biological material makes an essential difference to conscious experience, conscious experience is not reducible to its biological basis. I defend the positions that Aristotle’s philosophy of perception and emotion is not compatible with contemporary functionalism and that conscious experience of perception and emotion is irreducible to its essential biological basis
Keywords functionalism  causation  emotion  perception  cognitive neuroscience
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0019-0365
DOI 10.5840/ipq20024225
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotelian Materialism.L. S. Carrier - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (3):253-266.
Aristotle and Heidegger on the “Worldliness” of Emotion: A Hermeneutical Auseinandersetzung.Dennis E. Skocz - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):157-168.
Aristotle on Perception.Stephen Everson - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Towards a New Feeling Theory of Emotion.Uriah Kriegel - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):420-442.
Emotion Experience and its Varieties.Nico H. Frijda - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (3):264-271.
Expendable Emotions.Kristján Kristjánsson - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):5-22.
Feeling is Perceiving: Core Affect and Conceptualization in the Experience of Emotion.Lisa Feldman Barrett - 2005 - In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press. pp. 255-284.
Emotion and Perception in Aristotle's Rhetoric.P. Nieuwenburg - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):86 – 100.
Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW]J. A. Towey - 1999 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
58 ( #166,971 of 2,374,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,358 of 2,374,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes