Discussion. Earman and Norton on supertasks that generate indeterminism


Abstract
In a recent discussion, Earman and Norton [(1998)] propose a classification of supertasks that generate indeterminism which is flawed. An emendation is presented here.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/50.1.137
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,685
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Beautiful Supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism and a Supertask.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):49-54.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Labours of Zeno – a Supertask Indeed?Barbara M. Sattler - 2019 - Ancient Philosophy Today 1 (1):1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
11 ( #723,632 of 2,280,837 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #575,745 of 2,280,837 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature