Philosophia Christi 3 (2):459-472 (2001)

Authors
Eric LaRock
Oakland University
Abstract
I explicate the Churchland's dualistic interaction and neural dependence objections to Cartesian dualism and argue that Aquinas’s conception of Aristotelian hylomorphism provides a way out of those objections.
Keywords Cartesianism  Dualism  Mind-body  Aquinas
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/pc20013243
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aquinas's Account of Human Embryogenesis and Recent Interpretations.Jason Eberl - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):379 – 394.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas, Resurrection, and Material Continuity.Silas Langley - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:135-147.
Psychology and Mind in Aquinas.Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas - 2005 - History of Psychiatry 16 (3):291-310.
Dualism and its Importance for Medicine.Irene Switankowsky - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6):567-580.
Thomas Aquinas and Nonreductive Physicalism.Kevin W. Sharpe - 2005 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:217-227.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
25 ( #406,399 of 2,374,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #559,821 of 2,374,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes